| Indicator | University Z-score | Average country Z-score |
|---|---|---|
|
Multi-affiliation
|
0.040 | -0.073 |
|
Retracted Output
|
-0.306 | -0.152 |
|
Institutional Self-Citation
|
0.081 | -0.387 |
|
Discontinued Journals Output
|
-0.432 | -0.445 |
|
Hyperauthored Output
|
-0.363 | 0.135 |
|
Leadership Impact Gap
|
-0.508 | 0.306 |
|
Hyperprolific Authors
|
-0.251 | -0.151 |
|
Institutional Journal Output
|
-0.268 | -0.227 |
|
Redundant Output
|
1.025 | -0.003 |
The University of Regina demonstrates a robust scientific integrity profile, with an overall risk score of -0.214, indicating performance that is healthier than the global average. The institution exhibits significant strengths in maintaining low-risk practices, particularly in avoiding discontinued journals, managing hyper-prolific authorship, and ensuring a strong foundation of internally-led research impact. These areas of control reflect a solid governance framework. Key areas for strategic monitoring include the rates of multiple affiliations, institutional self-citation, and redundant output, which currently present a moderate deviation from the national standard. According to SCImago Institutions Rankings data, the University's research excellence is most prominent in thematic areas such as Physics and Astronomy, Psychology, and Energy. The identified risks, while moderate, could potentially challenge the institution's mission to provide "high quality and influential research" and foster "critical and independent thought." Specifically, tendencies toward self-citation or redundant publication could create an impression of insularity that contrasts with the goal of achieving global contributions. A proactive focus on enhancing authorship and citation policies will be crucial to ensure that institutional practices fully align with its stated commitment to excellence and integrity, thereby strengthening its already solid foundation.
The University of Regina presents a Z-score of 0.040, while the national average for Canada is -0.073. This result indicates a moderate deviation from the national norm, suggesting the institution shows a greater sensitivity to risk factors in this area than its Canadian peers. While multiple affiliations are often a legitimate result of researcher mobility or partnerships, a disproportionately high rate can signal strategic attempts to inflate institutional credit or “affiliation shopping”. This divergence from the national trend warrants a review to ensure that all declared affiliations correspond to substantive contributions and transparent collaborative agreements.
The University of Regina presents a Z-score of -0.306, compared to the Canadian national average of -0.152. This demonstrates a prudent profile, as the institution manages its post-publication quality control processes with more rigor than the national standard. Retractions are complex events, and a low rate suggests that the quality control mechanisms prior to publication are functioning effectively. This performance indicates a healthy integrity culture and robust methodological oversight, minimizing the occurrence of errors that could lead to retractions.
The University of Regina presents a Z-score of 0.081, which contrasts with the national average of -0.387. This moderate deviation suggests the institution is more prone to internal citation practices than its peers across the country. A certain level of self-citation is natural, reflecting the continuity of research lines. However, this elevated rate can signal concerning scientific isolation or 'echo chambers' where work is validated without sufficient external scrutiny. It warns of a potential risk of endogamous impact inflation, suggesting that the institution's academic influence may be oversized by internal dynamics rather than by broader recognition from the global community.
The University of Regina presents a Z-score of -0.432, which is nearly identical to the Canadian national average of -0.445. This reflects a state of integrity synchrony, showing total alignment with a national environment of maximum scientific security in this regard. The institution effectively avoids channeling its research into journals that fail to meet international ethical or quality standards. This operational silence in a low-risk area confirms a strong due diligence process in the selection of publication venues, protecting the university from reputational damage associated with predatory or low-quality practices.
The University of Regina presents a Z-score of -0.363, in a national context where the average is 0.135. This score highlights the institution's resilience, as its control mechanisms appear to successfully mitigate the systemic risks related to authorship inflation that are more prevalent at the national level. By maintaining a low rate of hyper-authored publications outside of "Big Science" contexts, the university effectively avoids practices like author list inflation or 'honorary' authorships, thereby reinforcing individual accountability and transparency in its research contributions.
The University of Regina presents a Z-score of -0.508, standing in sharp contrast to the Canadian national average of 0.306. This demonstrates strong institutional resilience, indicating that the university's scientific prestige is built upon a solid foundation of internally-led research. Unlike the national trend, where impact is more often dependent on external collaborations, the university shows that its excellence metrics result from genuine internal capacity. This low gap signals a sustainable and structurally sound research ecosystem where the institution exercises clear intellectual leadership in its output.
The University of Regina presents a Z-score of -0.251, which is lower than the Canadian national average of -0.151. This prudent profile indicates that the institution manages its publication processes with more rigor than the national standard, effectively curbing extreme individual publication volumes. This suggests a healthy balance between quantity and quality, steering clear of risks such as coercive authorship or the assignment of authorship without real participation. The university's performance reflects a culture that prioritizes the integrity of the scientific record over the simple inflation of metrics.
The University of Regina presents a Z-score of -0.268, closely mirroring the national average of -0.227. This indicates integrity synchrony and a complete alignment with the secure national environment regarding this indicator. The near-zero activity in this area demonstrates that the institution's research output consistently undergoes independent external peer review, avoiding the conflicts of interest and academic endogamy associated with excessive reliance on in-house journals. This practice enhances the global visibility and competitive validation of its scientific production.
The University of Regina presents a Z-score of 1.025, a significant departure from the national average of -0.003. This moderate deviation suggests the institution is more exposed to practices that lead to redundant publications than its Canadian peers. A high value alerts to the potential practice of dividing a coherent study into minimal publishable units to artificially inflate productivity, also known as 'salami slicing.' This pattern warrants attention, as it can distort the available scientific evidence and overburden the review system by prioritizing publication volume over the generation of significant new knowledge.
