| Indicator | University Z-score | Average country Z-score |
|---|---|---|
|
Multi-affiliation
|
-1.044 | -0.674 |
|
Retracted Output
|
-0.080 | 0.065 |
|
Institutional Self-Citation
|
1.023 | 1.821 |
|
Discontinued Journals Output
|
3.602 | 3.408 |
|
Hyperauthored Output
|
-1.152 | -0.938 |
|
Leadership Impact Gap
|
-1.554 | -0.391 |
|
Hyperprolific Authors
|
-0.472 | -0.484 |
|
Institutional Journal Output
|
-0.268 | 0.189 |
|
Redundant Output
|
0.088 | -0.207 |
Dian Nuswantoro University demonstrates a robust and commendable scientific integrity profile, marked by significant strengths in operational transparency and intellectual leadership. The institution exhibits very low risk in areas such as Multiple Affiliations, Hyper-Authored Output, and Output in Institutional Journals, and shows a particularly strong performance in building impact based on its own leadership capacity. These positive indicators are complemented by notable thematic strengths, with SCImago Institutions Rankings data placing the university among the top national performers in Chemistry (9th), Environmental Science (12th), Engineering (15th), and Economics, Econometrics and Finance (21st). However, this solid foundation is challenged by a critical vulnerability: a significant rate of publication in discontinued journals, which exceeds an already high national average. This practice, along with medium-risk signals in institutional self-citation and redundant output, directly contradicts the mission to be a "high quality university" and foster genuine "creativity and innovation." To fully align its practices with its stated mission, the university is encouraged to implement targeted strategies focusing on enhancing due diligence in publication venue selection and reinforcing a culture that prioritizes substantive contribution over sheer volume.
With a Z-score of -1.044, Dian Nuswantoro University shows a very low incidence of multiple affiliations, a figure that is even more conservative than the national average of -0.674. This demonstrates a healthy alignment with the national standard of transparency in collaborative work. The absence of risk signals suggests that the institution's affiliations are clear and legitimate, reflecting genuine partnerships rather than strategic attempts to inflate institutional credit or engage in “affiliation shopping.” This practice reinforces the integrity and clarity of its research contributions.
The institution maintains a low Z-score of -0.080 for retracted output, showcasing notable resilience when compared to the medium-risk national environment (Z-score of 0.065). This favorable gap suggests that the university's internal quality control and supervision mechanisms are effectively mitigating the systemic vulnerabilities observed across the country. A low rate of retractions, in this context, points to a robust pre-publication review process and a strong integrity culture, indicating that potential methodological flaws or malpractice are being successfully prevented before they enter the scientific record.
Dian Nuswantoro University presents a medium-risk Z-score of 1.023 in institutional self-citation, a level that indicates differentiated management compared to the higher national average of 1.821. Although the institution is not immune to the common national tendency of self-referencing, it demonstrates a greater capacity to moderate this behavior. This suggests a partial control over the risk of creating scientific 'echo chambers' where work is validated internally without sufficient external scrutiny. While the rate is still a point for observation, the university is managing to curb the more extreme dynamics of endogamous impact inflation seen elsewhere in the country.
The university's Z-score of 3.602 for output in discontinued journals is a significant and urgent concern, positioning it as a global red flag by exceeding the already critical national average of 3.408. This high Z-score indicates that a substantial portion of the institution's research is being channeled through media that fail to meet international ethical or quality standards. This practice not only exposes the university to severe reputational risks but also suggests a systemic failure in due diligence when selecting dissemination channels. It is imperative to implement information literacy programs to prevent the waste of resources on 'predatory' or low-quality publications.
The institution's Z-score of -1.152 reflects a very low rate of hyper-authored publications, consistent with the low-risk national benchmark of -0.938. This alignment indicates that authorship practices at the university are well-calibrated and transparent. The absence of risk signals in this area suggests that author lists are not being artificially inflated, thereby preserving individual accountability and distinguishing its legitimate collaborative work from questionable 'honorary' or political authorship practices.
With a Z-score of -1.554, the university demonstrates an exceptionally low gap between its overall impact and the impact of research under its direct leadership, performing significantly better than the national average of -0.391. This is a powerful indicator of institutional maturity and sustainability. It signals that the university's scientific prestige is not dependent on external partners but is driven by its own structural capacity and intellectual leadership, reflecting a robust and self-sufficient research ecosystem.
The university's Z-score for hyperprolific authors is -0.472, a figure that reflects statistical normality as it is nearly identical to the national average of -0.484. This alignment indicates that the productivity levels of its researchers are within the expected range for its context. The risk level is low and typical, suggesting that there are no widespread imbalances between quantity and quality or systemic issues related to coercive authorship or other practices that prioritize metrics over the integrity of the scientific record.
Dian Nuswantoro University shows a Z-score of -0.268 for publications in its own journals, indicating a state of preventive isolation from a national trend where this practice is a medium-level risk (country Z-score of 0.189). By not replicating the risk dynamics observed in its environment, the university demonstrates a strong commitment to external, independent peer review. This approach mitigates conflicts of interest, avoids academic endogamy, and ensures its research is validated through competitive global channels rather than potentially using internal journals as 'fast tracks' to inflate publication counts.
The institution exhibits a moderate deviation from the national norm with a Z-score of 0.088 for redundant output, which is notably higher than the country's low-risk average of -0.207. This suggests the university is more sensitive than its peers to risk factors associated with data fragmentation. A medium-level score alerts to the potential practice of 'salami slicing,' where a single coherent study may be divided into minimal publishable units to artificially inflate productivity metrics. This behavior can distort the scientific evidence base and warrants a review to ensure research is presented with maximum substance and impact.
